The Walking Dead comics begin with our protagonist awakening from a deep coma. He finds that everything has changed. Atlanta was a dead, horror-filled city for a while, with corpses scattered across the fields and mourning everywhere. The army has disappeared, school hospitals have closed, and the entire society has fallen apart. It’s like going back to the beginning of time. They don’t recognize their lovers, wives, parents, girls, or even children. They do not know what tomorrow holds, whether they will have food or water to drink, nor where the end is. They only live for the moment, and if they don’t, they will die from zombies. The world is about to end, not the zombies’ causes or disaster development. It also shows the level of work. The focus is not on zombies, although they are a major part of the story.

It is a comic that focuses on the relationship between people. It is trying, in a way, to recreate the historical context for the evolution of modern society. This includes the family, the society, the nation, the culture, the ethics, the moral form and the ethics of today. A person’s social form is one “person”. From this stage on, how can humans form social groups and small clusters of one, then slowly form larger functional social groups?

Rick, an ex-policeman, was badly injured during a gunfight and was in intensive care for a number of months. When I woke-up, the world was upside down. They jumped from their hospital beds and died as the zombies chased them. Shane was the one who saved him and his son when a small group met along the road. Lori, his wife, believed that he had died and she moved in with Sean out of gratitude. This emotional reaction has been triggered by Rick’s survival. The 20-person small group was formed and then died. Rick was made the leader of the group, in order to ensure the safety of everyone, as well as the daily lives of the people and the travel to the next destination. The story begins with the description of each character’s personality and their conflicts. Without authority or law, the weakening of human nature becomes apparent. In the absence of law and authority, human nature is exposed. It is clear that people have flaws, but they aren’t enough to keep a system of social order.

Pixar’s creative animation and sound effects, in particular, create the immersive fictional world that Wall-E inhabits. Since the two main robot characters can’t emote nor express themselves or use language, much of their character is defined by their distinct sound. The diegetic audio effects that are assigned to Eve & Wall-E help to set the scene and allow the viewer to feel empathy for these characters despite being machines.

Wall-E is introduced in the opening scene, where he goes about his day on Earth. Wall-E makes a lot of mechanical sounds. He is a machine, so he has motors, metallic sounds, beeps and whistles. Wall-E seems to exist in an era not that far from now. The noises that Wall-E makes sound familiar, giving the impression that his technology is not far from what it is today. The visuals and the sounds tell the story of the robot’s origins: a robotic creation that was left on Earth many years after humans disappeared. The sounds that this character makes give him life and personality. Wall-E becomes more human by allowing him to think and feel. This is made possible by the fact that Wall-E uses so many different noises and that these are paired perfectly with each of his tiny movements. He appears more real. Wall-E appears to have a life of his own because the sounds are so detailed and numerous. They immerse the viewer into the story and character. Wall-E’s thoughts and emotions are shown through his vocal sounds. Even though Wall-E rarely speaks, his emotions can be clearly seen through the computerized voice he uses. These sounds help draw attention to Wall E’s movements. They also highlight small gestures that express his emotions, such as trembling and the way his eyes move. It allows viewers to understand Wall-E better and empathize, even if there are no words or humans.

Eve is a complete contrast to Wall-E. Eve is quieter than Wall-E, and does not make the same clunky motorized sounds. Eve’s voice is futuristic and includes hums, sounds, and beeps. These characteristics highlight the fact that the robots have been created in a far-off future. Her design and sounds indicate that Wall-E was not created in the same time period as her. Her movements are quiet and humming, which is unusual for machines today. This, combined with the time change, indicates that she was created with better technology to accomplish her mission. Eve’s mechanical design limits her ability to make small movements and show emotion. As a result, she relies on sound to convey her feelings. Eve’s design doesn’t allow for as much movement and physical expression as Wall-E. She expresses her emotions through sounds that are more human. Eve has a unique way of showing emotion and character. She can laugh. Her voice inflection and more words are used to convey her feelings than Wall E. It is evident in the scene when she is trying to find plants and has no luck. She clearly gets frustrated and makes sounds like groans and shouts of frustration.

Wall-E heavily relies on sounds unique to Wall, Eve and the rest of the cast to make the robot characters seem alive and human, but they are not.

In 1947. Andy Dufresne was found guilty by a jury of murdering Linda Dufresne along with Glenn Quinti. Andy Dufresne is stubborn and insistent in his claim of innocence. However, the evidence is overwhelming. He is sentenced to two lifetime sentences at Shawshank Penitentiary. Red is a long-serving prisoner at Shawshank. Andy becomes Red’s best friend in prison. Red is a man known for his ability to obtain any item a prisoner might want. Andy, who has been imprisoned for a month, approaches Red and demands a rock-hammer to resume his rock-collecting and rock-shaping hobby. Shawshank’s harsh environment is filled with vicious guards, heartless outbursts and frequent sexual assaults. Andy is victimized by Bogs, the leader of the “Sisters” gang.

Andy, in order to escape the abuse, takes a one-week job at a nearby factory tarring roofs. Andy, who is at the factory, hears Byron Hadley complain about a tax on the inheritance he received. He sees an opportunity. Andy offers Hadley protection by helping him avoid taxes. Hadley, who has recently become a friend of Andy’s, beats Bogs so badly that he gets him transferred to an outside hospital. Red gives Andy the Rita Hayworth poster he wants when Andy comes back from the infirmary.

Norton, who is the warden in this prison, gives Andy a place to work at the library. This will allow him to assist the guards and himself financially. Andy works to improve the library in order to help educate his inmates. He also writes daily to the Senate, requesting more books. After Sometime a gentle Brooks, an elderly inmate who has served 50 years of prison, is released and sent into the world. The real world doesn’t agree with him. He ends up in a halfway home after serving 50 years and hangs himself. Norton started a prisoner program to allow them to begin working on the infrastructure outside of the prison. He began receiving bribes for this from local business owners who feared that prison workers would take their jobs.

Andy hides away the money in an account with a fake name and helps the warden for several years to launder the money. Red and Andy become friends with Tommy Wiliams in 1964 when Shawshank receives a new inmate. Andy helps Tommy to learn to read, get a degree and discovers that Tommy is the one who really killed Andy’s lover and wife. Andy is hopeful that a second trial will be held and he informs his warden. However, he wants to protect himself and so has Tommy shot and Andy sent to solitary. Andy, when he is finally released from solitary, tells Red of his freedom dreams, which include living in Zihuatanejo. Red says that this would never happen. Andy is still hopeful and tells Red about his plans to live in Zihuatanejo, a Mexican coastal town.

Andy leaves the room for roll-call on the day after, having escaped through a large hole he’d been digging for many years. He poses in the name of the fake person who has all the money Norton has deposited. He then takes the money to Mexico and leaves. During the course of his actions, he alerts the authorities to Norton’s unethical business practices. The warden shoots himself when the police arrive to arrest him. Red is finally released from prison after 40 years and goes to the Buxton location that Andy told him about. Red finds a money box, a letter written by Andy and some money. The two friends are reunited when he does.

Shawshank Redemption is one of my favorite movies. Professor Ryan Duffy allowed me to watch it in class. This movie has several morals that I found very interesting.

The power of the characters was the first moral principle in this movie. All characters were in a position of power that led to sinful outcomes. Guards who were ruthless and without compassion used force against prisoners was the most extreme. It is wrong because the prisoners were falsely accused and punished even if they weren’t guilty. Although we may not be able to tell for certain what happened, the cruelty of the guards in the movie made us feel sorry for the prisoners. The guards abuse their power to gain the respect of the prisoner, but they get it back.

Norton, director, is also linked to the story, as he assumed that his words would rule Shawshank Prison. He tortured prisoners without any consideration for their personal lives. I was shocked by the murder of a prisoner after he expressed his innocence. I felt like a critic was defeated because no one could express any kind of anger or sadness without being tortured.

Inside Out, a program that clearly promotes slavery, is another way power has been misused. The prisoners’ eagerness to work was quite interesting, but from an outsider’s perspective I saw the whole thing as corrupt and slave labour. Norton forced them to work primarily for money. He had no sympathy for the inmates. It is a form of exploitation, as Norton used the discipline and hard work of others to help himself. The Bible was also at odds with him, because he firmly held it in his hands while doing things that were totally against its teachings. Thomas’ murder is a good example of him going against the Bible. Thomas had no choice but to kill him, as he was well aware of the reality. No matter what, the above portrayals led me to identify with Dufresne/Red more than Norton/guards. However, these two also did things in contradiction with good moral standards.

Dufresne started working at the jail’s monetary office, and he used it to his advantage. He altered prison rules and created false documents. Then, he used false evidence to the end of the process in order to complete the job and destroy Norton’s life. Norton was then deemed the one who should be held responsible. Because he had acted based on a false conviction, his actions appeared ethically legal, since it was only a matter of seeking retribution. Our moral perspective is distorted by our feelings.

By escaping at the end, he makes us feel good for his abilities to catch others and get the best of everything, all without revealing to his companions how they helped him. We see Red’s activities differently as time goes on, and I cried with satisfaction when they two reunited in the final scene of the film.

Looking back through our movies, I saw that all the characters tried to achieve happiness and find ways to get themselves out of prison. Dufresne became less moral due to his surroundings in the movie. The idea behind all actions is that they will have a consequence and we must take into consideration the consequences of our actions before we decide to act. Boggs was sentenced for his torturing of Dufresne, despite not considering the consequences.

Dufresne had a good idea of what would happen to him, and he took advantage of that. Norton’s killing of Thomas was immoral as well, because he believed Thomas to be innocent and knew it. Norton was trying to avoid any punishments that could be imposed on him because Dufresne’s conviction had been certified as unfair. The movie has many ideas that we have discussed in class. It also shows the various ethical ideas in our society. In my opinion, it was one the best films ever made.

A Beautiful Mind is a film about John Nash. Nash shows himself to be a brilliant mathematician with a strange personality. He’s antisocial, doesn’t like distractions, is hard-working and dislikes people because of poor social skills. John Nash is a Princeton University student who works hard to develop a game theory concept. Nash’s mental health is affected by his daily dedication and sacrifice. He works under constant stress, and becomes agitated if things do not go as he had expected. As a Princeton professor, Nash works for a private research institution. His psychotic disorders have been going unnoticed since years. Nash experiences constant hallucinations. He has had a fictional roommate since his college years. His hallucinations that he was working at The Pentagon are now an obsession. He married Alicia Larder and they had a boy. He was sent to a mental hospital for treatment when his mental condition worsened, and he began to believe that Russian spies followed him to capture him due to his work. There, he realized that his imaginary spy friend, as well as his secret work, were not real. After his hospitalization, he has marital issues and is unable to care for his child. He decides to stop taking his medication. In order to stop his hallucinations, he asks for help from his wife and attempts to make improvements. This leads him to move back to Princeton and find a position. He has now learned to distinguish between his hallucinations and reality. As such, he is living his life by ignoring the things he believes he sees.

John’s behaviour is very different from his peers at the start of the film. He doesn’t talk to them or engage in a conversation. He feels like he’s in competition with the other mathematicians at Princeton University, so he works long hours in his bedroom to complete his work. He was motivated twice as much by his financial status than any other student because he had a low income. I believe that the stress he experienced caused abnormalities in his brain, which interfered with thinking and perception processes. He also had confused thoughts. Stress can lead to schizophrenia. According to the statement, “A study has shown that severe abnormal behaviors are common”. The poorest and most socially disadvantaged people are more likely to suffer from schizophrenia and other mental disorders.

It was not mentioned in the movie if John’s family members suffered from this condition. So, I think that John developed schizophrenia because he was under constant pressure at work and was very stressed. According to an article by Jurij bon entitled “Variable Causes of Social Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: The Interplay of Neurocognitive Personal, and Intersubjective Factors”, “The Course of Schizophrenia is Far From Following the Same Pattern in Different Individuals.” It can be a sudden onset or gradually develop.

Good Will Hunting, a movie in which the janitor at MIT is the smartest person on campus. Will Hunting comes to the realization that he’s holding his own happiness back despite having support from others and a psychology prof. Carl Jung’s original idea is that each viewer can recognize different characters in the film. Carl Jung believed that every mind shared a collective unconscious memory. The Archetype concept is a twelve-step story structure, or the hero’s quest, that is used in Good Will Hunting.

First, we have the “ordinary life” of our hero. Will Hunting, our hero genius, is living in the “ordinary world”, where he spends most of his time getting into trouble with authorities. Will represents two archetypes, the hero and orphan archetypes (which create an emotional connection). Orphaned heroes are familiar to everyone. They appear in stories such as Harry Potter and Oliver Twist. When comparing Will to these stories, the common archetype of a hero is demonstrated by their ability to overcome obstacles in order achieve goals. Will is able to overcome his abusive childhood and the class system in order to achieve more than he expected.

Will is able to avoid prison and achieve the second goal, “a Call to Adventure”, when he encounters his herald. Will is mopping the floor when he solves a mathematical problem. This causes Professor Lambeau, who is the archetypal herald, to go and find Will. The herald character is the one who signals that a hero is about to undergo a change. It is evident when Lambeau sees Will being detained for assaulting an officer. Will does not go to jail, as long he keeps working with Lambeau.

Next is “refusal to call”. Will will work with Professor Lambeau on his math, but won’t go to therapy. As he uses wit to deter 5 therapists, it’s clear he doesn’t want the guidelines. Sean may be the one person who can help him.

The fourth step involves’meeting mentor figures’. These are usually older people who have more knowledge. Mentors guide heroes on their journeys and teach them how to take care of themselves. Sean Maguire, Will’s sympathetic therapist, fills this part in Good Will Hunting. Sean Maguire changes Will’s life completely.

The hero will leave their everyday world to embark on their adventure in the fifth stage, called “crossing over the threshold”. Will and Skylar meet at a bar near Harvard University. Will doesn’t call Skylar back after a wonderful date because he is terrified. Will’s story begins with Sean having a conversation about Will. He is crossing the threshold to discover that he must change something in himself.

In the sixth stage, which is called ‘tests’, the hero must face new challenges. Harry Potter is at this point when he becomes friendly with Ron, Hermione, Draco and then turns against him. The difference is that in Good Will Hunting the step six and step seven are blurred together. This is because in Harry Potter the step six and step seven are separated by a step called ‘approach of the inmost grotto’. Following this conflict, Will’s ‘inmost-cave’ or goal is now clearly defined. Chuckie tells Will that it would be a great insult if he was still alive in 20 years. Will has never been told the truth before. Chuckie becomes the archetype of an ally – a character which helps the protagonist on his journey and provides something that the hero is lacking. Chuckie, on the other hand, provides Will with courage and advise. Chuckie stands by Will through his trials and helps him get to the destination he desires. Will is inspired by him to take on a more adventurous life. He’s an ally.

Step eight is referred to as ‘the experience’. It is a painful ordeal that is experienced by a character. Simba’s guilt when his father died is a famous example. Will’s struggle is when he lets his fears take over and tells Skylar she doesn’t matter. Sean says, “It wasn’t your fault” after mentioning Will’s past abuse. This is step nine, the’reward’. Will cries when Sean tells him, “It’s not your fault”. Will’s mental state changes as this moment happens.

Will is now on the 10th step of ‘the road to recovery’. He gets back to living his life and starts going to the therapy.

This leads us to the two final steps of the journey,’resurrection and return with the elixir. The film’s final scene represents the 12th stage of the journey. In this step, the hero carries the object they are searching for. In The Matrix Neo reveals the truth and gives a message.

Good Will Hunting accurately depicts the twelve steps.

Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, a book that has been translated into a fantastic film by the same team of writers who have created a number of other great books. It is still a good movie, even though the book was altered for the sakes of brevity or artistic flair. In the book, Dr. Spivey’s character is changed. When the book is turned into a movie, Spivey appears briefly, but has a greater role because McMurphy is the focus.

Kesey’s novel is told through the eyes of Bromden. A Native American with a mental illness who claims to be mute, Bromden tells his story. Bromden’s first-person narrative is a good fit for the book, as it gives a very honest account of events at the asylum. Bromden has a lot of hallucinations in his book which makes for an interesting read, but it would be difficult to show in a film. Bromden, a schizophrenic man, is best captured in words. But the movie format cannot do justice to his inner thoughts. The movie may have chosen to use the third-person perspective instead of Bromden as a narrator. We can’t see his inner thoughts, but we do know what the characters are doing. It was necessary to change the book into a film because it is impossible for a character who cannot speak to be the narrator and not have the ability of knowing what the character thinks. Bromden was dropped from the narrator role in order to make this film successful.

The movie also promotes McMurphy’s role as the protagonist. Jack Nicholson played McMurphy and was a Hollywood icon with the potential of making this film a blockbuster. Forman chose to make McMurphy a very appealing character to the audience. The book reader may not have liked McMurphy’s actions, but the movie audience cheers him on, as he fights Nurse Ratched and authorities. It is not surprising that with Jack Nicholson as the star of the film, the director would make McMurphy the main focus and leave Bromden out of it for the majority of the film.

McMurphy is a very different character in the book than he is in the movie. This has a significant impact on minor characters like Dr. Spivey. Dr. Spivey’s role in both the book and film is to diagnose whether McMurphy really is insane or is just trying to avoid work. While the movie’s doctor performs this same task, he is very different to the book’s doctor. The book has a character that is weaker than the movie. McMurphy gets a more profound impact from his role in movie than he does in book because McMurphy has the spotlight.

The doctor is amused by McMurphy’s brassy way of talking when they first meet him. Bromden says, “He is smiling as he flips through the folder. He’s just as tickled as we are by the brassy way this man talks. But, like us, he doesn’t laugh out loud.” (45). The book continues. After realizing that McMurphy went to the same high-school as him, Spivey becomes more friendly. In the film, Dr. Spivey doesn’t seem so friendly.

In the novel, when Dr. Spivey meets with the nurses and interns to discuss McMurphy, he hesitates before making a final decision. He instead asks what the others think of McMurphy, saying: “[H]e certainly is disturbing, this is evident.” This discussion, I think, is about deciding what action we should take with regard to him. Correct me if you disagree, Miss Ratched. I believe this meeting was called by the nurse to unify staff opinions and discuss the current situation. Nurse Ratched was the one who called the meeting and, implicitly, it was to satisfy her. It ended with her taking control and doing what she wanted.

In the movie, however, both times Dr Spivey interviews McMurphy he is professional and decisive. In the first movie interview, Dr. Spivey is straightforward with McMurphy. You are on court orders and we have a responsibility to the state. I want your cooperation. McMurphy is discharged by the doctor despite McMurphy’s and Nurse Ratched’s disagreement.

Dr. Spivey, in a major departure from the book’s portrayal, is the antagonist of McMurphy. This change in attitude is evident in the Dr. Spivey interviews of McMurphy. McMurphy has to be more aggressive and violate more rules. Bromden, who is shaken by the lobotomization of McMurphy, kills McMurphy to escape from the asylum. McMurphy is destroyed by Dr. Spivey’s decision. Bromden then kills McMurphy to escape the asylum. This is a terrible act but it shows the influence he had on the movie.

The doctor’s reaction to Nurse Ratched is another difference between the book and movie. The doctor in the book is respectful and even afraid towards Nurse Ratched. Harding says that Spivey, like all of us McMurphys, is aware of the inadequacy of his actions. He’s scared, desperate, and ineffective, and he’s aware of it. She knows that he does, and she reminds him of it every time she has the chance” (59). The nurse is implied to be afraid of reporting the doctor and getting him fired. He is afraid of losing his job, so he doesn’t speak up. Instead, he lets her run her ward in her own way. That is until McMurphy arrives and unintentionally empowers him. Within a short time, Spivey allowed patients to participate in recreational activities and even hosted a fishing excursion for the ward. This was despite Nurse Ratched’s opposition. The book’s doctor can finally implement his vision on proper psychiatric therapy, one that does not include bullying and coercion by Nurse Ratched. The doctor refused to resign even after Billy committed suicide and McMurphy attacked Nurse Ratched. He may have changed his mind because of McMurphy. The movie has Dr. Spivey on the authority’s side throughout.

Dr. Spivey is an important character in the movie and text, despite his small part. In both the text and the movie, Dr. Spivey plays an important role. He has a lesser impact on McMurphy in the book.

This assignment is often done by people who are familiar with the technology-based innovators of today, such as Steve Jobs and Elon Musk. This modern-day innovator and I are not the same. She is loved and known by almost everyone on the planet. Beyonce Knowles Carter or simply Beyonce. Many of her millions fans will be screaming Beyonce’s name. Why Beyonce – isn’t she just another singer? Beyonce has been called Queen Bey. Beyonce is a self-made businesswoman, singer, entrepreneur and investor.

In Houston, Texas, on the 4th of September 1981, her birthday, Queen Bey’s era began. After this, she began to excel in the entertainment industry. She won numerous talent competitions at a young age and amazed the crowds. The little girl in Houston, Texas who was about to become a household name was not known by many. Beyonce’s career grew from Houston talent shows to an all-female R&B singing group named Destiny’s Child. Beyonce formed Destiny’s Child while in highschool with Michelle Williams and Kelly Rowland. Soon, they were signed to Columbia Records. They became one of R&B’s most popular singing groups. Destiny’s Child broke up after almost 15 years. Beyonce decided to go solo. Beyonce has become one of the biggest female musicians in the music business. With her albums, she changed the rules of the game. She established herself in the music industry and made her future possible. She has created a unique style of visual concept album and creative expression through multi-dimensional means. She was the first female to have five singles in her studio chart at number one. Her album was also the fastest-selling album in iTunes’ history, with over 80,000 downloads within three hours. She is best known for her songs Single Ladies and Halo. Most if not all her songs are known around the globe. Beyonce’s career has seen a dramatic growth. She is a wonderful, generous person. She gives thousands of dollar to charities and organizations like Global Poverty and Education & Youth. Together with Salma Haiek, the famous actress founded Chime for Change. This global campaign raises funds and awareness for women and girls around the globe. Beyonce gave a total donation of $500,000. The money was used to support health and education programmes for women and young girls in developing country. It offers mentoring, career training and counseling to girls in New York. In Los Angeles, it provides support for victims who have been victims of sexual trafficking. Queen Bey is also funding Embrace Innovations that provides infant warmers at low cost and other ways for preemies to thrive in developing countries. To inspire more young girls to go to college, Beyonce created scholarship and program programs for women. Beyonce founded The Survivor Foundation in collaboration with her mom, Solange and Kelly Rowland. The foundation was created to assist victims of Hurricane Katrina. Her humanitarianism and her efforts in Houston, Texas are amazing. She is going back to Texas roots, helping those in dire need.

Once you are comfortable with her, let’s continue. I will give you even more reasons to admire Beyonce’s empire and her work. Beyonce’s career is impressive for someone who never completed high school. Even at the age of 37, Beyonce continues to make improvements in her life and society. She created a business empire and a music career out of her passion. In 2018, she generated about $87,000,000 through her publishing, music sales and modeling. She also had endorsement deals with films, fashion lines, endorsements, 118+ recordings sold, and 10+ Grammys. She launched # BeyGOOD as a hashtag to help homeless people, people without jobs, and sick kids. #BeyGOOD was used to raise funds at Saint Damien Pediatric Hospital Haiti for their pediatric cancer intakes.

Beyonce is a strong, inspiring, and amazing woman. She is a role model for millions of women and girls around the globe. Jay-Z is her hip-hop mogul spouse and they have been a couple goal since 2008. In 2013, they were named as the first billionaire couple. She is worth an estimated $335,000,000. Beyonce has become one of today’s most inspiring, powerful, and beautiful women. She is an inspiration to young women, and she will continue to lead them to success and empowerment.

The Matrix is similar to the Meditations of First Philosophy in that it presents a scenario involving a person being radically deceived by the external reality. Skeptics have argued that, if we could be deceived as to the nature of the outside world, we would not know what we thought of as our ordinary knowledge. The Matrix is a good argument, when combined with the skeptical principle. The Matrix portrays a fictional, computer-created world. The Matrix’s scenario is what I would call an examination of the deception hypotheses. The Matrix requires viewers to consider whether their current perceptions are possible without any world similar to them. This brings up a few questions. How does this film make the viewer question their own experience? This is it an actual screening of a philosophy claim? Is the screened version as convincing as the written claim of Descartes? What does it tell us, if at all, about the film’s nature?

Neo, the protagonist of The Matrix, is clearly troubled by his world. He tries to find out what’s bothering him. Neo does not believe that his world is real. Trinity and Trinity’s cronies intervene, and Neo realizes the world he has believed to be true is only an illusion. Neo comes to this realization after Morpheus, leader of all the rebels, gives him a drug. Neo is taken into a room with a lot of computer and video equipment that’s being operated by several people. The electrodes are placed into his ear and taped on his chest. Morpheus informs Neo that he has taken a pill that is part a program to help him find Neo. Neo can now see reality in its true form. Neo sees himself in a reflective mirror. The image appears to fracture, with lights appearing in it. It moves as if a fluid. Neo reaches up to touch it and his finger sinks into the liquid mirror as if he were touching mercury. The liquid mirror pulls with his finger when he removes it. It eventually returns to the original shape. Morpheus is asking Neo about his dreams. When you wake up, how will you be able to tell the difference between your dream world and reality? Neo starts to fibrillate, as the mirror-like material moves from his arm up to his chest. I claim that this film gives viewers a similar experience as Neo. They will see the world in the same way. After all, while we were looking at the movie screen, we had assumed that what we saw was accurate information. The images we saw projected on the movie screen were interpreted as the real world of the film. The filmmakers also disrupt our perception of the film’s world by presenting us with a real experience (albeit a fictional one) that makes us realize our senses are deceiving us. By doing so, the film transforms the perception that we have of the screen opening up a fantasy world to us. It then becomes an awareness of how the screen hides the world behind representations which are not matched in the imaginary world. Neo experiences a similar awareness, though his is a more real-world experience. The film does this by showing us that the computer simulations that make up the Matrix are also similar to what the film claims. The Matrix shows its viewers a fictional world. We are deluded by the film about reality.

Humans in this fictional world are actually living a skeptical thought-experiment. The Matrix is shown as a computer-generated illusion, which we had believed was the fictional world of the film. This is similar to what Descartes said about reality being nothing more than a demon’s appearance. Because the film is so quick, the viewer does not always grasp what he or she has seen. Later scenes provide viewers with a better understanding of the metaphysics by showing them the characters in their Matrix form, and then intercutting that with the real world behind this manipulated illusion.

A fight between Neo, and Morpheus is one example. The film shows the crew members watching Neo and Morpheus in CRTs as Morpheus tells Neo repeatedly to stop believing that the Matrix world is real. This will allow him to realize his true abilities and power. This juxtaposition shows the Matrix world and Trinity’s gaze at Neo as they both look on screen. Neo also comes to the realization that his world was nothing more than a computerized simulation. It is as if we are experiencing the same experience that Neo did when he realized that the Matrix was a computer-generated projection. What we find is that we were mistaken in believing the’real’ film world was actually a computer-generated projection. The Matrix can make the Matrix seem (fictionally), but it is not. It is an interesting twist on Descartes’ hypothesis of deception. The film, by substituting rebellious computer networks for the evil demonic demons, shows that it is capable of deceiving its audience in a similar way to what Descartes imagined the demon to do to him. The Matrix can deceive viewers into believing that (fictional) realities are real. We have been led to believe that the Matrix is real by the film, just as Neo and his fellow inhabitants are led to believe. It is not only films that can lead readers to make false assumptions about their fictional worlds. The Matrix is unique in that it tricks viewers into believing they’re seeing a real world, even though they aren’t.

An earlier sequence establishes the power of the film to deceive its characters and its audience. Neo is being interrogated by computer agents after he has been arrested. The experience is frightening for him and ends with an agent injecting a creature that looks like a worm into his abdomen. Neo’s nightmare ends with him awakening. This leads to us – and Neo – changing our view of the scene. The film uses a trick that filmmakers have used for years: they frame the scene so that what audiences think is part of a fictional world in the film is actually the subjective experience of a character. The film leads viewers to this conclusion by manipulating their belief in the fictional world.

The film’s goal is to get audiences to accept the idea that what they perceive as the real-world is actually a projection. It asks them to consider whether such devices could have blocked us out of the world or allowed us to see it on the screen. The Matrix is a genuine philosophy film because it includes a complex thought-experiment within its larger narrative. The film deceives viewers in such a way as to make them doubt their own skepticism. This thought experiment is not only a modern update of Descartes’ evil demon thought experiments for an aging audience that worries more about virtual reality than the truths of science. But it also demonstrates how a technology used to screen reality can make us accept its own projections as real.

Conductor paragraph

Some people have a talent for making themselves appear more qualified than they actually are. From singers to athletes, some people make their living by making it appear that they have talent. Igor Stravinsky criticized orchestra conductors for their lack of musical skill. Stravinsky demonstrates his displeasure towards orchestral conductors through his use of diction and details.

Stravinsky dislikes orchestra conductors because of his detail-oriented approach. As an example, Stravinsky starts his tirade saying “Conducting and politics are both roles that rarely attract original minds”. Stravinsky uses conducting as an example of politics. Both roles are characterized by a greater focus on appearance than innovation or significance. Stravinsky says that conducting is a role where innovation and major change are not possible. Stravinsky also states that “great” conductors are like great actors who cannot play anything other than themselves. Composers are like actors who pretend to be musicians, but lack the actual musical ability. In order to appear more important, conductors must be competent in music. Stravinsky says that conductors, who are unable to adapt to their own work, adapt it to their “style”, their mannerisms. Composers, who lack musical talent and are unable to conduct music in a “style”, act as they please. Stravinsky’s contempt towards conductors is evident in this passage. Stravinsky, through his diction, criticizes orchestral conductors. Stravinsky argues that a successful conductor could be an unfinished musician but also a good angler. This analogy to fishing implies that conductors perform better when it comes to attracting an audience. This suggests that conductors do not compensate by improving their musical skills, but rather by convincing the audience they are better musicians. Stravinsky calls the job of orchestra conducting an “ego-disease”. The orchestra conductor’s job, which Stravinsky calls an “ego disease”, affects everyone who comes into contact with it. This includes the conductors, who may believe they are more important that they actually are, and the audience. As the “ego disease” spreads, the idea of orchestra conductors becoming important is propagated. Stravinsky describes orchestra conductors as “egotistical and false authority”. Stravinsky’s strong language confirms his conclusion that conductors don’t act on their musical talents, but are instead driven by ego. Stravinsky concludes the conductors are egotistical by calling them false, arbitrary and irrational. They only exist to make the conductor look important. Stravinsky uses diction to express his hatred of conductors.

Stravinsky’s frustration is shown through his diction and detail. He feels that conductors are more talented than they really are. Stravinsky has a tendency to be overshadowed as a conductor, or even by performers. In the absence of any musical talent himself, the conductor will rework the music by composers such as Stravinsky in order to fit with his desired style. This is how he gets the most credit. But in the field of conductors, it does not always mean that they are talented. Stravinsky advised that if you can’t hear the music, you shouldn’t go to a concert.

Freedom Writers: movie analysis essay

The Freedom Writers follows Erin Gruwell as she teaches English at Woodrow Wilson High School. But Erin teaches much more to her students than English. The film is an inspirational drama, directed by Richard LaGravenese with Hilary Swank. Mrs. Gruwell fights against her pessimistic, uninterested colleagues as the film moves on. She is trying to get her students to be interested in learning, and also learn about their lives. Despite all the obstacles and consequences that she has to face, Mrs. Gruwell strives to change the mindsets and lives of her English freshman and sophomore classes. This Freedom Writers Summary Essay shows us how the film portrays an educator who is dedicated to her pupils and their future.

Every main character in the movie learns. There are many different examples. The students initially were very apprehensive towards Mrs. Gruwell. Some students began to respect her after Mrs. Gruwell showed more concern for them than usual. Most students were still not interested in Mrs. Gruwell. However, by observing their classmates and learning from them, more students started to show respect and warmth towards her. Freedom Writers used operant learning. When the students received the assignment to send a note to Miep, Mrs. Gruwell was willing to investigate whether the letters could be sent to Miep and if she might visit the school. By offering a reward, Mrs. Gruwell was able to motivate the students into doing their homework. In Mrs. Gruwell’s classroom, the students also learned by classical conditioning. In their minds, they’d been taught that they are inferior and must resort to violence. Eva tells the story of her hatred of white people, which she learned from the fact that they had taken away her father because “they can”. Eva started out being incredibly anti-anyone. She had no trust in anyone else and a great hatred for any other race. Afraid of her own life because of all the challenges she faced, Eva lived a life full fear. Eva began to reveal herself by the time the film ended. She learned to not be afraid or hateful because she was shown that people were not out to harm her. Some people would actually support and help her from the goodness of their heart. She changed from shutting out everyone to openly respecting and trusting her peers. Ms. Campbell was the character on the other end of spectrum who had the least amount of learning. She never had any hope for her students. She actively battled Mrs. Gruwell, trying to keep the students in line. She believed that she was helping a lost cause, and no one else could help her. Ms. Campbell remained convinced that Mrs. Gruwell could not help them and she fought against her to prevent her from educating them during their junior and senior year. She was given many opportunities by Mrs. Gruwell to realize that her students needed help and were more complex than just violence. She tried to convince Ms. Campbell that budget money could be used to teach the students, but she refused. Ms. Campbell still had no confidence in her students despite the fact that their grades reflected how much they’d learned. Ms. Campbell, despite her disgusting negativity, makes a good argument in a scene. She tells Gruwell that she can’t “make someone want to be educated, the only thing you can achieve is getting them to obey.” Although I agree, you are able to make people listen. Although the true motivation to learn comes from within, you can still get someone to do so even if they are not interested. Although you can make someone obey to the point that they learn your lesson, it will not be at the same level.

My father, like Mrs. Gruwell, is a real inspiration for troubled children. Even though he has had many failures in his lifetime, he managed to rise above the rest of us and reach a high point in his personal life. He made many mistakes as he grew up. My mom and he had me as teenagers. My dad barely graduated from high school and didn’t go to college and had to work a “bottom-of-the-barrel” job. After 18 years, he now has a job that pays well, allows him to progress in the company, has a nice apartment, can do whatever he likes, and is also a fantastic father. He is the person who inspires me to achieve my goals. He taught that if I push myself hard enough, I can achieve anything.